🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its decision was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision is part of a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A top House leader argued the court had yet again shredded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.