🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid wider concerns about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for various offences “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.