🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using too much that system. Hire the project manager and later bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.